Adam Endicott wrote: > Claudio Grondi wrote: > >>Why is PIL *(Python Image Library) not suitable to do the graphics? >> >>http://www.pythonware.com/products/pil/ >> >>Claudio > > > I am using PIL for some other things, but what I need ImageMagick for > is to convert a PDF into a series of jpegs (one per page). Its the only > tool I've found to do this at a good enough resolution. >
What about GraphicsMagick. The package seems to be not very easy to use even if a COM ActiveX object is available for Windows and there is an executable with command line interface, but the documentation is poor. Originally derived from ImageMagick 5.5.2 it is available at: http://www.graphicsmagick.org/ I would be glad to hear how to do convert a PDF into a series of jpegs if it will become possible using it. PythonMagick interface to ImageMagick seems to be no more supported and if I remember it right, there was shortly a thread about it not really helping to work with it on Python 2.4.2 - that is how I came to know about GraphicsMagick. Hope GraphicsMagick can what ImageMagick could, so this hint turns out useful. Claudio -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
