RalfGB wrote: > Alex Martelli schrieb: > > > MrJean1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > This may work on MacOS X. An initial, simple test does yield credible > > > values. > > > > Definitely looks promising, thanks for the pointer. > > > > > However, I am not a MacOS X expert. It is unclear which field of the > > > malloc_statistics_t struct to use and how malloc_zone_statistics with > > > zone NULL accumulates the stats for all zones. > > > > It appears that all of this stuff is barely documented (if at all), not > > just online but also in books on advanced MacOS X programming. Still, I > > can research it further, since, after all, the opendarwin sources ARE > > online. Thanks again! > > > > > > Alex > > > "mallinfo" is available on most UNIX-like systems(Linux, Solaris, QNX, > etc.) and is also included in the dlmalloc library (which works on > win32). > > There is a small C extension module at > http://hathawaymix.org/Software/Sketches/ > which should give access to mallinfo() and thus byte accurate memory > usage information. > > I have to admit, that I did not tried it myself...
I tried it, it doesn't work for dlmalloc. Got to find somewhere else. Does any body know how to report correct memory usage if using dlmalloc package ? Thanks in advance. Mickie -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
