Ed Jensen a écrit : >>Well, despite your protestations, I think the GPL and LGPL are fairly >>easy and safe choices for a lot of developers who know enough about >>Free Software (ie. haven't just seen the name and thought "that's the >>thing for me"), know what the characteristics of those licences are, >>and who don't have the time or legal experience to "performance due >>diligence". > > > To be honest, I don't dislike the LGPL that much. The static vs. > dynamic linking issues bother me somewhat (which is why I like the > modified LGPL used by wxWidgets), but all in all, I can live (albeit > uncomfortably) with LGPL. It seems much more sane. Whereas including > one line of GPL code into your 10,000,000,000 line project can have > disasterous consequences (which I find ridiculous), at least with LGPL > you're only asked to share the changes you've made to that particular > library.
If you don't like the GPL, then by all means, *do not use GPL code !* Please, I mean, when you use without authorisation some code in your project, you are in trouble, no matter what licence the code was using. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
