Op 2005-11-22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Should some of the unicode mathematical symbols be reserved for
> literals?
> It would be greatly preferable to write \u2205 instead of the other
> proposed
> empty-set literal notation, {-}. Perhaps nullary operators could be
> defined,
> so that writing \u2205 alone is the same as __u2205__() i.e., calling
> the
> nullary function, whether it is defined at the local, lexical, module,
> or
> built-in scope.
Isn't this essentially already happening with lists?.
And isn't something like this already possible with properties, except
for the scoping.
If python would develop the property idea a bit further and have
variables that would call a function each time they are accessed,
something like this could work.
--
Antoon Pardon
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
