Steve Holden wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [...] > >>Maybe there are also other reasons to promise this property that I'm not > >>aware of. Certainly it seems like this property is useful and not hard > >>to provide for "non-perverse" implementations, much like the > > > > Thanks, but we don't need the list comprehension(or do we) ? As the > > return of d.iteritems() is already a list of tuples. > > > No it isn't: it's a dictionary item iterator. This can be used to > provide a list, but it's self-evidently an iterator, not a list: Oops, typo. I was meant to say d.items(). stand corrected.
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
