Fredrik Lundh wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > maybe it's time to change "equivalent to" to "similar to", to avoid > > > messing things up for people who reads the mostly informal library > > > reference as if it were an ISO specification. > > > > That is their fault as the library reference is supposed to be "(keep > > this under your pillow)", not for reading. > > you haven't made much sense in your most recent posts. why not > just give it up, and leave the design issues to people who don't re- > ply "I don't know" to every question. > Oh, find a need to shut other up ?
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
