Fredrik Lundh wrote: > Jeffrey Schwab wrote: > > >>>Is it correct to say that the typical ownership problem, which >>>frequently arises in C++, does not occur normally in Python? >> >>What "typical ownership problem" do you feel frequently arises in C++? >>If you are referring to the sometimes difficult task of determining >>which object owns a particular resource, why would it occur less in >>Python than in C++? > > > the problem isn't determining who owns it, the problem is determining > who's supposed to release it. that's not a very common problem in a > garbage-collected language...
Yes it is. Memory is only one type of resource. There are still files and sockets to close, pipes to flush, log messages to be printed, GDI contexts to free, locks to release, etc. In C++, these things are generally done by destructors, which are called automatically and deterministically. I am not a Python Guru, but in Perl, Java, and other languages that have built-in garbage collectors, these tasks have to be done explicitly. I find that this forces a procedural approach, even in an otherwise object-oriented program. If you want something like automatic garbage collection in C++, I recommend the use of Factories with destructors that release the Factories' products. The zeitgeist in c.l.c++.moderated seems to prefer the use of smart (reference-counted) pointers, which also rely on destructors to release resources automatically. Plentry of free, open-source implementations are available. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
