In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Piet van Oostrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>A more lightweight solution might be Ice. <http://www.zeroc.com/ice.html> >It is architecturally similar to Corba, but with less overhead. More lightweight and less overhead in what sense? The performance measurements I've seen show that Ice is significantly slower than many CORBA implementations. If you mean more lightweight in terms of ease of use, I don't see how. I quite agree that it's more lightweight in terms of size of specification and difficulty for the ORB implementor, but that's largely irrelevant to the users of the technology. Cheers, Duncan. -- -- Duncan Grisby -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- http://www.grisby.org -- -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
