Roy Smith wrote: > Now you're assuming that the message is a constant for all TypeErrors > caused by attempting to iterate over a non-iterable object.
Yes I am, and of course you are correct that that could change and so shouldn't be relied on. Seems that my crappy solution is not quite as future-proof as I thought it was. Since a better solution does exist, I agree it should be used in preference to my crappy one, assuming you are running a recent enough version of Python. -- Steven. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
