Op 2005-11-04, Stefan Arentz schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Antoon Pardon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ... > >> > Ah yes. Well, good luck with that. You seem to have decided that it is not >> > sane and who am I to argue with that. It depends on your state of mind :-) >> >> I can just say the opposite, that you seem to have decided that it is >> sane. > > I have. I like the Python model.
Fine good for you. > >> > The model makes sense in my opinion. If you don't like it then there are >> > plenty of other languages to choose from that have decided to implement >> > things differently. >> >> And again this argument. Like it or leave it, as if one can't in general >> like the language, without being blind for a number of shortcomings. > > Personally I don't see it as a shortcoming. Which isn't the point. >> It is this kind of recations that make me think a number of people is >> blindly devoted to the language to the point that any criticism of >> the language becomes intollerable. > > No not at all. Just look at all the PEPs and the changes in the language > that have been made in the past. Python is very much community driven and > that shows in it's progress. > > You on the other hand keep talking about emo things like 'sane' and > 'madness' without giving any technical backing about these problems > that you are having with the language. That you took those emotionally, is not my responsibility. Would you prefered it, had I called it a wart? As far as I see it, any negative comment on python is reacted to in pretty much the same way. So don't blame it on me using emotional language. -- Antoon Pardon -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
