On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:22:11 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Which is quite fast. The only problems is that the file might be huge.
What *you* call huge and what *Python* calls huge may be very different indeed. What are you calling huge? > I really have no need for reading the entire file into a string as I am > doing here. All I want is to count occurences this substring. Can I > somehow count occurences in a file without reading it into a string > first? Magic? You have to read the file into memory at some stage, otherwise how can you see what value the bytes are? The only question is, can you read it all into one big string (in which case, your solution is unlikely to be beaten), or do you have to read the file in chunks and deal with the boundary cases (which is harder)? Here is another thought. What are you going to do with the count when you are done? That sounds to me like a pretty pointless result: "Hi user, the file XYZ has 27 occurrences of bitpattern \x00\x00\x01\x00. Would you like to do another file?" If you are planning to use this count to do something, perhaps there is a more efficient way to combine the two steps into one -- especially valuable if your files really are huge. -- Steven. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
