Michele Petrazzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen wrote: > > How about: > > > > list.sort(key=lambda x: x[3]) > > > > Does that work? > > Yes, on my linux-test-box it work, but I my developer pc I don't have > the 2.4 yet. I think that this is a good reason for update :)
Updating is a good idea, and will let you get even faster by avoiding the lambda: import operator thelist.sort(key=operator.itemgetter(3)) However, until you can upgrade you might be happy enough with a direct implementation of the decorate-sort-undecorate (DSU) idiom which they new "key=" named argument to sort implements. To wit: aux = [ (x[3], x) for x in thelist ] aux.sort() thelist[:] = [ x[-1] for x in aux ] Note that the "decoration" can include as many "columns" as you want, transformations obtained by calling int(...) or str(...) on some of the columns, and so on. This applies to "key=" in 2.4 just as well as to the (slightly slower) direct implementation in 2.3 and earlier. Alex -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
