In comp.lang.perl.misc John Bokma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roedy Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 8 Oct 2005 23:39:27 GMT, John Bokma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote or >> quoted :
>>>Yeah, yeah, and 640K is enough for everybody. Same song, different tune. >> For how long. Surely attachments are a stop gap. Can you imagine >> people sharing images that way 100 years from now? > No, but I agree with you :-) I am not using HTML myself in email, but I > will when it makes things easier. >> Why should we wait for the future? The problems blocking easy to use >> photo sharing are not technological but social. > Yup, agreed. Like I already wrote, if I route all HTML email to /dev/null > I'll lose some customers, and some friends :-) What I find is that when I see emails which are obviously spam, I simply do not read them and delete them immediately. But then I use Pine rather than a web browser... and while some forms of HTML may be rendered, nothing is automatically pulled down. Axel -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
