That's a damned elegant solution -- thank you...
However in trying to simplify my problem for presentation here, I think
I oversimplified a bit too much. Try this one:
>>> d = {}
>>> for x in [1,2,3]:
... d[x] = lambda *args: args[0]*x
...
>>> d[1](3)
9
The lambda is going to have to take arbitrary arguments, so I can't
specify x=x before the arbitrary arguments (otherwise, it gets
overridden) and I can't specify it afterward (syntax error). :-/ Thanks!
-jag
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 16:27 -0400, Jp Calderone wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 16:18:15 -0400, Joshua Ginsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >So this part makes total sense to me:
> >
> >>>> d = {}
> >>>> for x in [1,2,3]:
> >... d[x] = lambda y: y*x
> >...
> >>>> d[1](3)
> >9
> >
> >Because x in the lambda definition isn't evaluated until the lambda is
> >executed, at which point x is 3.
> >
> >Is there a way to specifically hard code into that lambda definition the
> >contemporary value of an external variable? In other words, is there a
> >way to rewrite the line "d[x] = lambda y: y*x" so that it is always the
> >case that d[1](3) = 3?
>
> There are several ways, but this one involves the least additional typing:
>
> >>> d = {}
> >>> for x in 1, 2, 3:
> ... d[x] = lambda y, x=x: y * x
> ...
> >>> d[1](3)
> 3
>
> Who needs closures, anyway? :)
>
> Jp
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
