On 10/3/05, Roel Schroeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Indeed, and that's by design: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Of course, that's only one side of the argument: http://www.blackgate.net/consulting/reply-to_munging_useful.html On lists like this, where everyone benefits by sharing information, it seems pretty lame to hide behind purist arguments about Reply-To: headers. The default behavior should be the one most useful to the list. Think for a moment how many useful bits of information you've missed because the default for this list it to make conversations private. -- # p.d. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
