"Dave Benjamin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hooray! After years of arguing over which syntax to use, and finally > giving up since nobody could agree,
I understand that this has become the local 'politically correct' view, but as a participant in the discussion, I know it not true and actively deceptive. The community was prevented from coming to a decision. There was a 'primary' vote with an incumbent, 15 challengers, and several write-ins. But there was no runoff. As recorded in http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0308.html, the incumbent proposal, Guido's favorite from beginning to end, x if C else y, was tied for 1st in rejections and was only 4th in acceptances, being beaten by (if C: x else: y) (which was also first in rejections) C ? x : y if C then x else y Among the other proposals also, about 3/4ths had the order C x y. I think if nothing else, the vote showed that the community pretty strongly preferred the order C x y to x C y. I am pretty sure that a vote then (and probably now) on that specific issue would have favored the first. But that idea, along with any runoff among the best exemplars of each order, was *rejected*, along with notice that 'unofficial' votes conducted by community members would be ignored. The discussion and decision process was also inhibited by the lack of any ground rules as to what would be an acceptible candidate. So there was lots of confusion and lots of time wasted on 'favorite son' candidates that had no chance of winning (much as there once was on the first round of voting at American presidential nominating conventions). There was also, that I knew of, no definition of success nor a process aimed at success. I doubt that many actually expected the obviously preliminary vote to reach a definitive conclusion. Even in the recent py-dev discussion, Guido declined, when I specifically asked, to reveal his 'ballot' of alternatives he was considering. So what were we actually supposed to discuss? Naturally, there followed irrelevant noise posts on impossible alternatives and peripheral issues. And this became a reason for Guido to 'just decide' on his original favorite, no explanation offered. ---------- The lesson for me is to spend much less time on Python discussion and much more on unfinished projects. So even if I never use the new syntax, I will have gained something ;-) Terry J. Reedy -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
