Aahz wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Jeff Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Sure, multiple machines are probably the right approach for the OP; I >>didn't mean to disagree with that. I just don't think they are "the >>only practical way for a multi-process application to scale beyond a few >>processors," like you said. For many (most?) applications in need of >>serious scalability, multi-processor servers are preferable. IBM has >>eServers available with up to 64 processors each, and Sun sells E25Ks >>with 72 processors apiece. I like to work on those sorts of machine >>when possible. Of course, they're not right for every application, >>especially since they're so expensive. > > > Do these use shared memory?
Yes. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
