Peter Hansen wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>>I found LGT http://lgt.berlios.de/ but it didn't seem as if the >>>NanoThreads module had the same capabilites as stackless. >> >>What specific capabilities of Stackless are you looking for, that are >>missing from NanoThreads? > > > While I can't speak for the OP, isn't it the case that the threadlets in > Stackless (sorry, don't know what they are really called) are true > threads in the sense of being able to switch contexts no matter how far > down in a set of nested calls they might be? And that NanoThreads are > simply generators, which means you can switch contexts only at the top > level, with a yield statement? > > I don't know what the OP wants, but I could imagine that would be a > pretty fundamental difference (if I'm right about Stackless).
You are. -- Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tismerysoft GmbH : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9A : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/ 14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ work +49 30 802 86 56 mobile +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 30 80 90 57 05 PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04 whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
