On Sunday 25 September 2005 22:30, Victor Ng wrote: > You could do it with a metaclass, but I think that's probably > overkill.
OK. And thanks for the example :-). It looks simple enough... I didn't think the solution would be overly complex. And the RLock makes it easier than I anticipated - was RLock not in existance when Synch.py from the old Python metaclass tutorial/demo was written? > It's not really efficient as it's doing test/set of an RLock all the > time, but hey - you didn't ask for efficient. :) Hmm... efficient is good. I was planning to do something with some kind of lock, but I'm fairly new to multithreaded programming. What would be a more efficient way to accomplish this? - Michael -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
