Thomas Heller wrote: > I'm slowly getting tired maintaining py2exe. It is far from perfect, > although it has interesting features (I would say). > > The problem, apart from the work, is that it is good enough for me - I > can do everything that I need with it. But I assume I use far less > libaries than other Python programmers, so a lot of bugs will never bite > me. > > It is also interesting that the recently introduced bundle-files option, > which allows to build single-file exes has gained a lot of interest - > although the ONLY use case (so far) I have myself for it is to implement > inproc COM servers which will compatible with Python clients (and other > Python inproc COM servers) because of the total isolation of the Python > VMs. > > Is anyone interested in taking over the maintainance, documentation, and > further development? > > Should py2exe be integrated into another, larger, package? Pywin32 > comes to mind, but also Philip Eby's setuptools (that's why I post to > distutils-sig as well)... > Ignoring all the philosophical questions I'd like to thank you for all your hard work on py2exe over the years, which has benefited the Windows Python community immeasurably.
regards Steve -- Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC www.holdenweb.com PyCon TX 2006 www.pycon.org -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
