On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Brett Hoerner wrote:
> Wouldn't the standard idiom be to actually put the code under the
> if-name, and not make a whole new main() function?
Yes.
The nice thing about the main() function, though, is that you can do the
most basic argument parsing in the if-block. Like so:
def powers(n):
m = 1
while True:
yield m
m = m * n
def main(n, limit):
for power in powers(n):
if (power > limit): break
print power
import sys
if (__name__ == "__main__"):
main(int(sys.argv[1]), int(sys.argv[2]))
That serves as a sort of documentation on the arguments to the script, and
also makes it easier for other scripts to reuse the main logic of the
program, since they don't have to package parameters up as a string array.
It is more verbose, though.
> I'm not sure I see the reason behind main(), couldn't that also
> interfere with other modules since main() seems like it might be common,
> not sure how it would work as I'm pretty new to Python myself.
The two mains would be in different namespaces, so they wouldn't conflict.
> from script import *
Don't do that. 'from script import x' is, IMNERHO, bad practice, and 'from
script import *' is exceptionally bad practice. I know a lot of people do,
but that doesn't make it right; namespaces are there for a reason.
tom
--
Science runs with us, making us Gods.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
