Is there anything wrong with using something like super(type(self),
self).f() to avoid having to hardcode a type? For example:
class A(object):
def f(self):
print "in A.f()"
class B(A):
def f(self):
super(type(self), self).f()
obj = A()
obj.f() # prints "in A.f()"
By "wrong" I mean, is there any reason why this is just a Bad Idea?
Seems helpful to me, if I change the name of the 'B' class, I don't
have to change super() calls as well.
--
Adam Monsen
http://adammonsen.com/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
