Left Right <olegsivo...@gmail.com> writes: >> Second, the word "lie" is far more harsh than what I presume >> you meant to say. For me, and I think for most people, the word >> "lie" implies a deliberate intent to deceive. > > No, it doesn't. Consider Joseph Conrand's Heart of Darkness,
No, thank you. I am trying to help you to understand how people are reacting to your posts. I suggested that saying that the grammar is incorrect or contains an error would have expressed exactly what you intended without triggering hostile reactions, which I'm assuming you don't want. [...] > English literature lessons aside, even if you believe what you believe > about the meaning of the word, you could at least try to find the > irony, that was the larger goal, than to immediately presume you are > being attacked, and start retaliating instead of looking into the > problem. I'm not aware that I have been attacked or that I have retaliated. (No need to explain why you might think I have.) One more thing: your Usenet or email client probably adds an attribution line above any quoted text. I urge you to leave it in place. It makes the discussion easier to follow, especially for those of us who read the comp.lang.python Usenet newsgroup rather than the mailing list. I do not intend to reply further. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) keith.s.thompso...@gmail.com void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */ -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list