On 2025-04-18 13:24:28 +1200, Greg Ewing via Python-list wrote: > On 18/04/25 9:41 am, Mats Wichmann wrote: > > There's just not a really great answer to this. > > Seems to me a system-installed application shouldn't be looking in the > user's .local packages in the first place. That should only be for things > the user has installed "for this user".
It's not the application that looks into .local, it's Python. If you say that a system-installed Python shouldn't look into ~/.local, then you've just disabled that mechanism completely. If not then Python would somehow have to distinguish between system-installed and user-installed scripts. This isn't as easy as checking whether the path starts with /usr/bin or whether it belongs to root. Tying into the system's package manager doesn't look appealing to me (not to mention that it might be unacceptably slow). hjp -- _ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality. |_|_) | | | | | h...@hjp.at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing __/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list