On Sun, 14 Jan 2024 at 23:28, Left Right <olegsivo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Having worked with a bunch of different grammar languages, the one > used for Python isn't a recognizable BNF derivative.
That might possibly be because it isn't? It's not BNF. It's PEG. Or are you a long way behind the times? > For example, you may say "functions in Python are > objects", but you cannot put a function definition in the head of the > for loop clause. What do you mean? for x in lambda: ...: ... Perfectly grammatical. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
