Chris Angelico 在 2023年1月25日 星期三下午1:16:25 [UTC+8] 的信中寫道：
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 14:42, Jach Feng <jf...@ms4.hinet.net> wrote:
> > I was happy working with argparse during implement my script. To save the
> > typing, I used a default equation for testing.
> >
> > sample = "-4^2+5.3*abs(-2-1)/2, abs(Abc)*(B+C)/D, (-3) *
> > sqrt(1-(x1/7)*(y1/7)) * sqrt(abs((x0-4.5)/(y0-4)))"
> > parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Convert infix notation to
> > postfix')
> > parser.add_argument('infix', nargs='?', default=sample, help="....")
> >
> You're still not really using argparse as an argument parser. Why not
> just do your own -h checking? Stop trying to use argparse for what
> it's not designed for, and then wondering why it isn't doing what you
> expect it to magically know.
>
> ChrisA
I just don't get what you mean?
> You're still not really using argparse as an argument parser. Why not just do
> your own -h checking?
Is a math equation not qualified as a command line "argument"? What criteria do
you use when judging the quality of an "argument"?
> Stop trying to use argparse for what it's not designed for,
Even the author considers a positional argument begin with '-' is a legal
argument. Below is a quote from its manual.
"If you have positional arguments that must begin with - and don’t look like
negative numbers, you can insert the pseudo-argument '--' which tells
parse_args() that everything after that is a positional argument"
> and then wondering why it isn't doing what you expect it to magically know."
I don't expect magic, I expect the consistency of a parser.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
