Dave Hansen wrote: > Again, iterating over an item that is mutating seems like a Bad > Idea(tm) to me. But I was curious: is this the intended behavior, or > does this fall under what C programmers would call 'undefined > behavior.'
a C programmer wouldn't have much problem with this, of course,
since "for in" behaves like:
for (tmp = 0; var = getitem(seq, tmp); tmp++) {
...
}
</F>
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
