On 5/11/22 4:25 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
Maybe it's one of those terms that is useless for actual coding (because practicality beats purity), but good for discussions?
I'm not sure it's much good for discussions, either. I don't really care whether a language is "purely OO" or not, whatever that means, because I don't see purity of OO as a virtue. All I care about is what actual features then language has. -- Greg -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
