> Beside this, wxPython (and wxWidgets) is often told to be more complete, > better documented and better supported than GTK/PyGTK.
Is wxPython often told to be more documented? By who? Several months ago I wanted to choose a nice GUI for Python (Tkinter was out of question). I choosed PyGTK for one reason - it was much, much better documented than wxPython. I have tried to write programs using wxPython and I have always ended looking for some details in wxPython's docs for hours. I think that wxPython has more widgets (and therefore one can say it's more complete) - but it's an advantage only when these extra widgets are needed. It has also another advantage over PyGTK - the native look and feel. Write a program in wxPython and it will look natively on the system it will be run. But the documentation of wxPython is just ugly in comparison to the documentation of PyGTK. (Well - it was so in June this year.) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
