On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 21:57, Axy via Python-list <python-list@python.org> wrote: > > > > Not sure what you mean, but a for-else without a break is quite > > useless. What exactly ARE you arguing here? > > > > The else is associated with the break to the exact extent that one is > > essential to the other's value. > > I'm not arguing. That was just for the record, how things are done in > Python. Basically, I simply asked a question and got a definite answer > and clear understanding shortly, in a few replies. All the rest of this > thread looks irrelevant to me, it's about coding style and probably > should be continued under a different title, but I'm not interested to > participate in it.
Here's where the "rest of this thread" started: > Actually the reason I never used "else" was the violation of the rule of > beauty "shortest block first". You disparaged a feature on the basis of a style rule that few of us had heard of or agree with. We all agree that coding style is important; none of us would see block length as a reason to avoid using an else clause on a for loop. Your subsequent posts have left me confused as to what you're trying to convey. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
