Trent Mick wrote: > Yah. It was added before Guido more clearly stated that he thought > modules should have a successful life outside the core before being > accepted in the stdlib.
Perhaps so, but Guido was also quite keen to get PEP-282 implemented for inclusion in 2.3, and pronounced on the code that I put forward for inclusion. The original code was all in one module - I partitioned it into a package with subpackages as part of the review process conducted on python-dev, in which Guido and several others took an active part. I'm not sure that there really is a problem here, other than naming convention. Since it's not practical to turn the clock back, my vote would be to just live with it. I'd rather focus my energies on functional improvements such as better configuration, etc. Not that I get as much time as I'd like to work on improvements to logging - but we've probably all been in an analogous position :-( Regards, Vinay -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
