On 15Jun2022 05:49, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 at 05:45, Roel Schroeven <r...@roelschroeven.net> wrote:
>> Not (necessarily) a main function, but these days the general
>> recommendation seems to be to use the "if __name__ == '__main__':"
>> construct, so that the file can be used as a module as well as as a
>> script. Even for short simple things that can be helpful when doing
>> things like running tests or extracting docstrings.
>
>If it does need to be used as a module as well as a script, sure. But
>(a) not everything does, and (b) even then, you don't need a main()
>function; what you need is the name-is-main check. The main function
>is only necessary when you need to be able to invoke your main entry
>point externally, AND this main entry point doesn't have a better
>name. That's fairly rare in my experience.

While I will lazily not-use-a-function in dev, using a function has the 
benefit of avoiding accidental global variable use, because assignments 
within the function will always make local variables. That is a big plus 
for me all on its own. I've used this practice as far back as Pascal, 
which also let you write outside-a-function code, and consider it a 
great avoider of a common potential bug situation.

Cheers,
Cameron Simpson <c...@cskk.id.au>
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to