> On 18 Apr 2022, at 13:01, Peter J. Holzer <hjp-pyt...@hjp.at> wrote: > > On 2022-04-16 20:25:45 +0100, Barry wrote: >> Suggest that you start with the use cases that you want supported. >> Then you can turn them into a set of tests to check that the solution works. > > Writing test cases is always a good idea :-)
Did you write the use cases? Without them how can anyone review the tests? Barry > > I have now written a first set of test cases: > https://git.hjp.at:3000/hjp/timedeltacal > (together with a quick and dirty implementation that passes them). > > That's not complete yet. > > If covers addition of timezone aware datetime values and timedeltacal > values fairly well, and also tests the t0 + (t1 - t0) == t1 property I > alluded to elsewhere in this thread. > > It doesn't test canonicalization yet (and indeed the prototype > implementation is a mess in this regard) and subtracting timedeltacals > from datetimes is also still missing. > > hp > > -- > _ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality. > |_|_) | | > | | | h...@hjp.at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing > __/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!" > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
