No, nor did I suggest that you did. `context` is presumably an attribute in the `bpy` module, for which you are creating a `context` attribute in your module.
On Mon, 2022-03-21 at 22:31 +0100, Paul St George wrote: > Hi, > I do not (knowingly) have a module called ‘context'. > > > > > > On 21 Mar 2022, at 22:24, Paul Bryan <pbr...@anode.ca> wrote: > > > > Assuming `bpy` is a module, you're creating a new attribute in your > > module, `context`, that contains a reference to the same object > > that is referenced in the `context` attribute in the `bpy` module. > > > > On Mon, 2022-03-21 at 22:12 +0100, Paul St George wrote: > > > > > > When I am writing code, I often do things like this: > > > > > > context = bpy.context # convenience > > > > > > then whenever I need bpy.context, I only need to write context > > > > > > > > > Here’s my question: > > > > > > When I forget to use the convenient shorter form > > > > > > why is bpy.context not interpreted as bpy.bpy.context? > > > > > > > > > — > > > Paul St George > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
