Julio Di Egidio <ju...@diegidio.name> writes: > On Thursday, 2 September 2021 at 16:51:24 UTC+2, Christian Gollwitzer wrote: >> Am 02.09.21 um 16:49 schrieb Julio Di Egidio: >> > On Thursday, 2 September 2021 at 16:41:38 UTC+2, Peter Pearson wrote: >> >> On Thu, 02 Sep 2021 10:51:03 -0300, Hope Rouselle wrote: >> > >> >>> 39.60000000000001 >> >> >> >> Welcome to the exciting world of roundoff error: >> > >> > Welcome to the exiting world of Usenet. >> > >> > *Plonk* >> >> Pretty harsh, isn't it? He gave a concise example of the same inaccuracy >> right afterwards. > > And I thought you were not seeing my posts... > > Given that I have already given a full explanation, you guys, that you > realise it or not, are simply adding noise for the usual pub-level > discussion I must most charitably guess. > > Anyway, just my opinion. (EOD.)
Which is certainly appreciated --- as a rule. Pub-level noise is pretty much unavoidable in investigation, education. Being wrong is, too, unavoidable in investigation, education. There is a point we eventually publish at the most respected journals, but that's a whole other interval of the time-line. IOW, chill out! :-D (Give us a C-k and meet us up in the next thread. Oh, my, you're not a Gnus user: you are a G2/1.0 user. That's pretty scary.) By the way, how's sci.logic going? I, too, lost my patience there. :-) -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
