In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Aahz wrote: >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >> Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >.> >>>Bear in mind that the PSF made its very first grants last year. The >>>reason none of those grants was awarded to a documentation project was >>>that the (volunteer) Grants Committee and helpers didn't see any >>>documentation projects worthy of support. >> >> Really? And what exactly is "Software Engineering with Python for >> Scientist and Engineers" if not a documentation project? It may not be >> the kind of documentation people are talking about in this thread, but it >> certainly is documentation. > >Sigh. Fine. Any more nits you'd like to pick?
<scratch head> Why are you calling this a nit? It is direct proof that the PSF is prepared to allocate financial resources to improve the Python documentation. We only await people to take up the challenge. -- Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ The way to build large Python applications is to componentize and loosely-couple the hell out of everything. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
