Oh right, and another example: The binary names for debug builds have a _d suffix, but modules like pip (which I assume can only be installed with get-pip.py) expect them not to have this suffix. Once I started copying lots of .exe and .lib files around just to make the distribution work I started to think I was missing something.
Cheers, -Patrick > On Jul 10, 2020, at 8:01 AM, Patrick Stinson <patrickk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Building python from source on windows is straightforward enough with > PCBuild/build.bat. But it seems as though the resulting distribution that > runs from these standard build dirs ends up sort of incomplete and/or > fragmented - at least for what I am used to on *NIX. > > Binaries are in ./PCBuild/platform instead of ./bin, there is no pip, then > get-pip.py installs the pip module but puts the pip script in ./Scripts. And > other things… > > Is there some kind of install step that I am missing? It’s fine if this is > just a matter of adjusting to a non-standard distribution config, but I have > always had the feeling that the distribution doesn’t really work correctly. > > Cheers, > -Patrick -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list