On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 08:36, Greg Ewing <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > > On 4/03/20 12:52 pm, Marco Sulla wrote: > > Why can't an asynchronous coroutine be simply a coroutine that has an > > `async` or an `await` in its code, without `async` in the signature? > > That wouldn't help as much as you seem to think. You still need > to use 'await' whenever you call a coroutine, so switching a > function between coroutine and non-coroutine would still have > just as much of a ripple effect on the rest of your code.
Good point. But what if you don't need `await`? A coroutine call `mycoro()` could act as the actual `await mycoro()`. If you really want `mycoro()` actual behavior, you could write `async mycoro()`. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
