On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 11:31 AM duncan smith <duncan@invalid.invalid> wrote: > but (tentatively) opted for something that avoided creating new names at > the module level. If it doesn't look too terrible I might stick with it > for now (although I am quite tempted to go back to the above). Thanks > Skip and Chris.
Nah, nothing wrong with creating module-level names for things that would otherwise be builtins. It's like how a __future__ directive applies to the module it's in. Go ahead! It's a nice practical easy way to do things. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
