Antoon, > There is a difference between not understanding why things are as > you are told, and assuming because you don't understand, what you > are told is wrong.
The other side is you guys, expecting from me that, even though I appearantly do not understand it, just take whatever has being said as the truth. > Instead of trying to understand, you started to dispute. Correct. I didn't understand, so I argued my point, and expected the other to argue his. My arguing could have clarified where I when off my rockers, his arguing could have shown me where I did. Whats wrong with that ? > Yes, you made a mistake. You relied on a specific example where > things turned out as you expected. And /anyone/ was allowed to come up with an example to counter it. Heck, noone even tried to explain, beyond a "there are two garbage collectors", why my example was wrong. > That you think you can infer general behaviour from your limited > experience is a mistake. Do I have any other option ? Most noone here actually tried to even understand what I asked, let alone try to explain their own stance. How am I to learn otherwise ? I just have to create my own experiences. And no, just parotting someone elses word has never appealed to me. Sorry. I need to see it (not) working , or no deal. Regards, Rudy Wieser -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
