I apologize to all but the intended recipient for this. I’d have given him
feedback in private if I knew his email.
I will take leave from the list now. Keep up the good work, friendly
responders.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 17:13 Luciano Ramalho <luci...@ramalho.org> wrote:
> Now that’s a novel approach to asking for free help: pretending to be
> smarter than the people who are trying to help you.
>
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 14:17 R.Wieser <address@not.available> wrote:
>
>> Michael,
>>
>> > Sure but the Python methods* themselves are exposed and accessible
>> > and according to your previous posts, all you want to do is add an
>> > argument to a call to the existing method. If that's true, then you
>> > should be able to do that part from pure Python.
>>
>> >* class methods defined by the C code
>>
>> Feel free to post code showing that it can be done. The extension is
>> RPi.GPIO, the method is "output", and the extra argument is the pinnaming
>> scheme (BCM or BOARD). Success! :-p
>>
>> > I can understand that the pure C stuff is not accessible of course.
>> > But the snippets you've shown so far don't show any of that.
>>
>> Where did you think that "static PyObject *py_proc1(PyObject *self,
>> PyObject
>> *args)" came from, or why I said "I've also tried to go the C way" ?
>> Besides that, the subject line should have been a dead giveaway by
>> itself ...
>>
>> > We're working in the dark here
>>
>> Are you sure ? MRAB didn't seem to have too much problems with both
>> recognising and understanding what I was busy with - he posted a spot-on
>> example, containing not more, but also not anything less than what I was
>> asking for.
>>
>> > Looking at existing examples, as well as the C API documentation
>>
>> I did not find any example that showed me what I needed to know - simply
>> one
>> CPython function calling another one. And yes, I've found multiple
>> documentation pages, including the "Extending and Embedding the Python
>> Interpreter" ones. Alas, no dice.
>>
>> Most of that documentation is only good when you already know what you are
>> looking for, and need to make sure of its exact usage. Not so much the
>> other way around, when you have no clue and are searching for what you
>> need
>> to use to solve a particular problem (even one as stupid as just calling
>> another method)
>>
>>
>> By the way, the whole solution consists outof the following:
>>
>> static PyObject *py_proc1(PyObject *self, int ExtraArg, PyObject *args)
>> {
>> ....
>> Py_RETURN_NONE
>> }
>>
>> static PyObject *py_proc2(PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
>> {
>> return py_proc1(self, 42, args)
>> }
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rudy Wieser
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>>
> --
> Luciano Ramalho
> | Author of Fluent Python (O'Reilly, 2015)
> | http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920032519.do
> | Technical Principal at ThoughtWorks
> | Twitter: @ramalhoorg
>
--
Luciano Ramalho
| Author of Fluent Python (O'Reilly, 2015)
| http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920032519.do
| Technical Principal at ThoughtWorks
| Twitter: @ramalhoorg
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
