Dave, > OK I'm old enough cancer to know what X10 is. :-)
Ah, so that is the name I forgot. :-) > I wouldn't think this is too difficult to do as you're only sending. You're right, codewise it isn't. > For this application IMO there is too much going on inside python that can > interrupt the cycle of modulation. (Intra and Extra python; garbage > collection, other processes, etc) Actually, it seems to work rather well. Ofcourse, that is with just the python program running, and sending the code a couple of times for good measure. > I would drop back to a simple program in C that you execute from python A program I wrote before even thinking of doing the same in Python. :-) My goal here was to see if I could do the same in pure python. I can, but barily. > Let me stress, my advise is doing this *reliably*. :-) Not possible without any kind of "is it on?" checking/feed-back mechanism. As such a one-way signalling as is used for those wall-warts is "best effort" at best. > Once you have this working reliably, you could then look to convert > it to a python c-module to more tightly integrate it. Interfacing Python with C{something} was already on the agenda. Using this as a goal is a likely candidate. :-) Regards, Rudy Wieser -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list