"Neil Schemenauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > In the future, sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is > suggested rather than posting to only to python-list.
Thank you information. Since python.org is mostly stuff other than the mailing lists, I did not think of that. Adding it to the CC line for this reply. > What's > happening is that Spambayes is marking the message as UNSURE. The > message that mailman sends to the sender is unfortunate. The > "Message has a suspicious header" notice is misleading because the > user did not have any header in their message that caused it to be > held (at least normally not). Is that hardwired into Spambayes or can it be edited. > I'm not sure why many legitimate messages are being flagged as > UNSURE. I'll look into it. Then my 'misdirected' query will have worked anyway. Thank you. > Hmm, the message should eventually get through since it ends up > getting moderated by a person. My embargoed reply, which I believe I sent Sunday, was released mid-Thursday. > Maybe they are getting overwhelmed and are making some mistakes. Fewer false positives would make life easier for everyone. Perhaps a whitelist of regular and long-terms posters would help. I think most or all of the 4 people who responed 'me too' would also qualify. What still puzzles me is why the spamblocker that embargoed me and others did not catch such obvious spam as Subject: Re: The penis is way too delicate for masturbation (and occasional others like this). If you need a regular c.l.p reader to forward missed spam for addition to the training base, I would volunteer. Terry J. Reedy -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
