On 28/07/2019 19.04, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 9:48 AM Michael Torrie <torr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/28/19 5:55 AM, Jonathan Moules wrote:
>>> But this appears to be explicitly called out as being "Worse" in PEP8:
>>>
>>> """
>>> Don't compare boolean values to True or False using ==.
>>>
>>> Yes: if greeting:
>>> No: if greeting == True:
>>> Worse: if greeting is True:
>>> """
>>
>> Yet the recommended solution to the problem of wanting a default
>> argument of an empty list is something like this:
>>
>> def foo(bar=False);
>> if bar is False:
>> bar = []
>>
>> ....
>>
>> Clearly in this case the expression "not bar" would be incorrect.
>
> This is a fairly unusual case, though. More commonly, the default
> would be None, not False, and "if bar is None:" is extremely well
> known and idiomatic.
That's certainly how I would have done it until I read your post. But
reading it immediately raised the question of why not:
def foo( bar=[] ):
if len(bar)==0:
print( "Pretty short" )
else:
print( bar )
return
Seems to work just fine.
--
Michael F. Stemper
Deuteronomy 24:17
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
