Às 22:21 de 21/04/19, Paul Rubin escreveu: > Paulo da Silva <p_s_d_a_s_i_l_v_a...@netcabo.pt> writes: >> splitter={} >> for f in Objs: >> splitter.setdefault(f.getId1,[]).append(f) >> groups=[gs for gs in splitter.values() if len(gs)>1] > > It's easiest if you can sort the input list and then use > itertools.groupby. Yes, sort and groupby seems the best way to go. Thanks. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
- Better ways for implementing two situations Paulo da Silva
- Re: Better ways for implementing two situations MRAB
- Re: Better ways for implementing two situations Paulo da Silva
- Re: Better ways for implementing two situations DL Neil
- Re: Better ways for implementing two situations Paulo da Silva
- Re: Better ways for implementing two situations Paulo da Silva
- Re: Better ways for implementing two situations Paulo da Silva