On 2019-02-19, MRAB <pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:
> On 2019-02-19 18:31, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I've noticed that afer downloading a .exe under Linux and
>> scp'ing the file to a Windows machine, it wont run when double-clicked
>> until I fire up a Cygwin shell and do a
>>
>> chmod +x <whatever>.exe
>>
>> [I assume there's native Windows point-and-grunt means for doing that
>> as well.]
>>
>> So, in addition to the suffix and associations, there's some sort of
>> file-system meta-data that determines whether a file is "executable"
>> in some contexts.
>>
> I've never heard of a Windows equivalent of "chmod +x".
Modern Windows filesystems have a complex set of file-level access
control mechanisms.
> If I copy the contents of a .exe into a new file and give it a .exe
> extension, it just works.
I assume that what I see is a side-effect of the fact that the sshd in
question is a Cygwin app, and it is creating files w/o the Posix "x"
mode bits set. In the Cygwin libraries, the Posix permission bits for
a directory entry get translated into the Windows ACLs for each file:
https://superuser.com/questions/954211/how-does-chmod-x-work-in-cygwin
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! BARBARA STANWYCK makes
at me nervous!!
gmail.com
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
