On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 6:55 AM Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2019-02-13, Schachner, Joseph <joseph.schach...@teledyne.com> wrote: > > > This makes some sense because NAN is Not A Number, so any comparison > > to a number fails. > > Ah, but you now seem to be conflating "comparison fails" with > "comparison has a boolean value of False". > > The alternative to (nan == nan) => False is probably not (nan == nan) > => True: it's (nan == nan) => exception.
Or (nan == nan) => nan, which is what "infections nan" would be like. (Compare NULL.) ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
