"Frank Millman" <fr...@chagford.com> writes:
> I have often read that the quickest way to concatenate a number of strings
> is to place them in a list and 'join' them -
>
> C:\Users\User>python -m timeit -s "x='a'*500; y='b'*500; z='c'*500"
> ''.join([x, y, z])
...
>
> I seem to have found a quicker method, using the new 'f' format operator -
>
> C:\Users\User>python -m timeit -s "x='a'*500; y='b'*500; z='c'*500"
> f'{x}{y}{z}'
If you look at the compiled byte code for the f-string case you'll see why
it's faster: there's nothing used other than opcodes designed specifically
for building strings.
I note that although 'x + y' is faster than f'{x}{y}', 'x + y + z' is
slower than f'{x}{y}{z}'. Apparently the overhead of making just _one_
temporary intermediate string is enough to tip the balance. I'm a bit
surprised that it doesn't take a few more than that. Although I imagine
that that balance might tip at a different point in future releases of
Python (I tested using 3.6.6).
--
Alan Bawden
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
