On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 2:12 AM, Dan Sommers <d...@tombstonezero.net> wrote: > On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 14:39:38 +0000, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > >> If a class' methods don't use self, it probably shouldn't be a class. > > Agreed. > >> I have often wished Python had proper namespaces, so I didn't have to >> abuse classes as containers in this way :-( >> >> (Not that I do this using "inner classes", but I do often want to use >> a class as a container for functions, without caring about "self" or >> wrapping everything in staticmethod.) > > Isn't that what modules are for? (I suspect that I'm missing something, > because I also suspect that you knew/know that.)
Yes, except that sometimes you want submodules without going for a package with modules inside it. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
