"Dan Sommers" wrote in message news:pl622a$a1f$1...@blaine.gmane.org...
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:46:01 +0200, Frank Millman wrote: > It is just a slight annoyance (to me) that pylint complains about the > subclass methods when they are called from the Field class. I don't > mind adding 10 stub methods to the Field class to keep it happy, but I > do not get the feeling that it is improving my code. I do grant, > however, that it may be of benefit to someone reading my code for the > first time. What about the next subclass, the one that doesn't exist today? If you write it, then you know to create those ten methods. If I write it, though, then those ten stubs tell me that I have to override them, and their docstrings tell me how. That is a huge improvement in long term maintainability.
Can't argue with that. I guess it shows that I am still stuck in a 'one-man project' mentality.
Frank -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
